• Home

  • Research

  • Publications

    • Drosophila

    • Science Education

  • Teaching

  • Lab Members

  • Protocols

  • Useful Links

  • Contact Us

modENCODE Abstracts

Click on the PubMed link below the abstract to view the article on PubMed

 

Science. 2010 Dec 24;330(6012):1787-97. Epub 2010 Dec 22

Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE.

The modENCODE Consortium, S Roy,…SCR Elgin...M Kellis

Department of Biology, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA

Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

To gain insight into how genomic information is translated into cellular and developmental programs, the Drosophila model organism Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (modENCODE) project is comprehensively mapping transcripts, histone modifications, chromosomal proteins, transcription factors, replication proteins and intermediates, and nucleosome properties across a developmental time course and in multiple cell lines. We have generated more than 700 data sets and discovered protein-coding, noncoding, RNA regulatory, replication, and chromatin elements, more than tripling the annotated portion of the Drosophila genome. Correlated activity patterns of these elements reveal a functional regulatory network, which predicts putative new functions for genes, reveals stage- and tissue-specific regulators, and enables gene-expression prediction. Our results provide a foundation for directed experimental and computational studies in Drosophila and related species and also a model for systematic data integration toward comprehensive genomic and functional annotation.

PubMed

Nature. 2011 Mar 24;471(7339):480-5. Epub 2010 Dec 22

Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Kharchenko, PV, AA Alekseyenko, YB Schwartz, A Minoda, NC.Riddle, J Ernst, PJ Sabo, E Larschan, AA Gorchakov, T Gu, D Linder-Basso, A Plachetka, G Shanower, MY Tolstorukov, LJ Luquette, R Xi, YL Jung, R Park, EP Bishop, TP Canfield, R Sandstrom, RE Thurman, DM MacAlpine, J Stamatoyannopoulos, M Kellis, SCR Elgin, MI Kuroda, V Pirrotta, G Karpen, PJ Park

Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

Chromatin is composed of DNA and a variety of modified histones and non-histone proteins, which have an impact on cell differentiation, gene regulation and other key cellular processes. Here we present a genome-wide chromatin landscape for Drosophila melanogaster based on eighteen histone modifications, summarized by nine prevalent combinatorial patterns. Integrative analysis with other data (non-histone chromatin proteins, DNase I hypersensitivity, GRO-Seq reads produced by engaged polymerase, short/long RNA products) reveals discrete characteristics of chromosomes, genes, regulatory elements and other functional domains. We find that active genes display distinct chromatin signatures that are correlated with disparate gene lengths, exon patterns, regulatory functions and genomic contexts. We also demonstrate a diversity of signatures among Polycomb targets that include a subset with paused polymerase. This systematic profiling and integrative analysis of chromatin signatures provides insights into how genomic elements are regulated, and will serve as a resource for future experimental investigations of genome structure and function.

PubMed

Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011 Jan;18(1):91-3. Epub 2010 Dec 5.

An assessment of histone-modification antibody quality.

Egelhofer TA, Minoda A, Klugman S, Lee K, Kolasinska-Zwierz P, Alekseyenko AA, Cheung MS, Day DS, Gadel S, Gorchakov AA, Gu T, Kharchenko PV, Kuan S, Latorre I, Linder-Basso D, Luu Y, Ngo Q, Perry M, Rechtsteiner A, Riddle NC, Schwartz YB, Shanower GA, Vielle A, Ahringer J, Elgin SCR, Kuroda MI, Pirrotta V, Ren B, Strome S, Park PJ, Karpen GH, Hawkins RD, Lieb JD

Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.

We have tested the specificity and utility of more than 200 antibodies raised against 57 different histone modifications in Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans and human cells. Although most antibodies performed well, more than 25% failed specificity tests by dot blot or western blot. Among specific antibodies, more than 20% failed in chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. We advise rigorous testing of histone-modification antibodies before use, and we provide a website for posting new test results (http://compbio.med.harvard.edu/antibodies/).

PubMed

Genome Res. 2011 Feb;21(2):147-63. Epub 2010 Dec 22

Plasticity in patterns of histone modifications and chromosomal proteins in Drosophila heterochromatin.

Riddle, NC, A Minoda, PV Kharchenko, AA Alekseyenko, YB Schwartz, MY Tolstorukov, AA Gorchakov, C Kennedy, D Linder-Basso, JD Jaffe, G Shanower, MI Kuroda, V Pirrotta, PJ Park, SCR Elgin, GH Karpen

Department of Biology, Washington University St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.

Eukaryotic genomes are packaged in two basic forms, euchromatin and heterochromatin. We have examined the composition and organization of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin in different cell types using ChIP-array analysis of histone modifications and chromosomal proteins. As anticipated, the pericentric heterochromatin and chromosome 4 are on average enriched for the "silencing" marks H3K9me2, H3K9me3, HP1a, and SU(VAR)3-9, and are generally depleted for marks associated with active transcription. The locations of the euchromatin-heterochromatin borders identified by these marks are similar in animal tissues and most cell lines, although the amount of heterochromatin is variable in some cell lines. Combinatorial analysis of chromatin patterns reveals distinct profiles for euchromatin, pericentric heterochromatin, and the 4th chromosome. Both silent and active protein-coding genes in heterochromatin display complex patterns of chromosomal proteins and histone modifications; a majority of the active genes exhibit both "activation" marks (e.g., H3K4me3 and H3K36me3) and "silencing" marks (e.g., H3K9me2 and HP1a). The hallmark of active genes in heterochromatic domains appears to be a loss of H3K9 methylation at the transcription start site. We also observe complex epigenomic profiles of intergenic regions, repeated transposable element (TE) sequences, and genes in the heterochromatic extensions. An unexpectedly large fraction of sequences in the euchromatic chromosome arms exhibits a heterochromatic chromatin signature, which differs in size, position, and impact on gene expression among cell types. We conclude that patterns of heterochromatin/euchromatin packaging show greater complexity and plasticity than anticipated. This comprehensive analysis provides a foundation for future studies of gene activity and chromosomal functions that are influenced by or dependent upon heterochromatin.

PubMed

Nature. 2009 Jun 18;459(7249):927-30.

Unlocking the secrets of the genome.

Celniker et al….and the modENCODE Consortium
Department of Genome Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.

Despite the successes of genomics, little is known about how genetic information produces complex organisms. A look at the crucial functional elements of fly and worm genomes could change that.

PubMed

Research Page

Abstracts:

Top of the Page 
 
  • Heterochromatin Abstracts
  • HP1 & HP2 Abstracts
  • hsp26 Abstracts
  • RNAi Abstracts
  • modENCODE Abstracts (top of page)

 

Washington University in St. Louis

f

Biology Department